What if someone had no skin on their hand just bone - Would they be able to move it and would it need to be amputated? Could they keep it that way?
Without skin, the hand would be exposed to the elements and would be susceptible to infection. The bones would be more fragile and could be easily broken. The person would likely experience pain and discomfort. It is unlikely that the person would be able to move the hand without causing further damage.
Amputation may be necessary if the hand becomes infected or if the bones are severely damaged. However, if the hand is properly cared for, it may be possible to keep it without amputation.
Related Questions and Answers
- Can a person survive without skin on their hand? Yes, but it would be very difficult and would require extensive medical care.
- Would a person be able to move their hand without skin? It is unlikely that a person would be able to move their hand without causing further damage.
- Would amputation be necessary if a person had no skin on their hand? Amputation may be necessary if the hand becomes infected or if the bones are severely damaged.
- Could a person keep their hand without skin if it was properly cared for? Yes, it may be possible to keep the hand without amputation if it is properly cared for.
- What are the risks of having no skin on your hand? The risks include infection, pain, discomfort, and damage to the bones.
Related Hot Selling Products
- Cramer Sports Medicine Therapy Putty
- Mueller Sports Medicine Finger Splint
- FUTURO Finger Splint
- Vive Hand Therapy Balls
- Amazon Basics Hand Grip Strengthener
Pre：What does giving the finger flipping someone off actually mean
Next：Why do typical AR 15 stocks have such a jagged shape on the bottom
^