How Many More Calories Does Running Burn Compared to Cycling? Which One Is More Efficient for Losing Weight?
Running and cycling are both excellent calorie-burning exercises. However, running burns more calories than cycling. A person weighing 150 pounds will burn approximately 100 calories per mile while running and 60 calories per mile while cycling at a moderate pace. This means that running burns about 40% more calories than cycling.
In addition to burning more calories, running is also a more efficient way to lose weight. This is because running requires more energy than cycling, which means that the body will continue to burn calories at a higher rate after a run than after a cycling workout.
So, if your goal is to lose weight, running is the more efficient choice. However, cycling is still a great option for people who are new to exercise or who have joint pain or other injuries that make running difficult.
FAQs
- What is the difference between running and cycling? Running is a weight-bearing exercise that uses the muscles in the legs, hips, and core. Cycling, on the other hand, is a non-weight-bearing exercise that primarily uses the muscles in the legs.
- Which exercise is better for burning calories? Running burns more calories than cycling.
- Which exercise is more efficient for losing weight? Running is more efficient for losing weight than cycling.
- Which exercise is better for people with joint pain? Cycling is better for people with joint pain than running.
- Which exercise is better for beginners? Both running and cycling are good options for beginners, but cycling may be a better choice for people who are new to exercise or who have joint pain.
Hot Products
- Nike Running Shoes
- Peloton Bike
- Bowflex Treadmill
- Garmin Forerunner Watch
- Fitbit Versa 3
Pre：Why do velodrome cyclists start slow
Next：How is cycling on a stationary bike different from regular cycling